# Commonwealth v. Hoak

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · August 12, 1997 · 700 A.2d 1263

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4954703

## Case

- **Full name:** COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Mark K. HOAK
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** August 12, 1997
- **Citations:** 700 A.2d 1263; 1997 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2637
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Schiller
- **Judges:** Cavanaugh, Cirillo, Eakin, Elliott, Hudock, Johnson, Popovich, Saylor, Schiller
- **Cited by:** 19 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4954703

## Opinion text

SCHILLER, Judge,
concurring.
I concur in the result. Because it is appellant’s burden to present an adequate record for appellate review, 1 and because the record submitted to this Court is clearly deficient, 2 we are powerless to grant appellant relief. Thus there is no basis upon which we can reverse the judgment of sentence entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Mercer County.
. Commonwealth v. Chopak, 532 Pa. 227 , 236 n. 5, 615 A.2d 696, 701, n. 5 (1992); Commonwealth v. Williams, 357 Pa.Super. 462, 466 , 516 A.2d 352, 354 (1986); Pa.R.A.P.1911(a); (d).
. See Dissenting Opinion, Johnson, J.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4954703. Public record. Not legal advice.