# In re Brown

> District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1997 · 694 A.2d 886

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4954171

## Case

- **Full name:** In re Warren E. BROWN, A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- **Court:** District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 22, 1997
- **Citations:** 694 A.2d 886; 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 114; 1997 WL 290156
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Farrell, King, Schwelb
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4954171

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
In this reciprocal discipline proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent be suspended for sixty days and required to show fitness before he is allowed to return to the practice of law in this jurisdiction. * Respondent, whom we suspended pending final disposition of this matter, does not object to that sanction, and Bar Counsel is in accord. Therefore,
*887 It is ORDERED that respondent, Warren E. Brown, shall be suspended from the practice of law for sixty days to begin when he has filed the affidavit required by D.C-App. R. XI, § 14(g). In the meantime, the interim suspension ordered by this court shall continue. Before respondent is readmitted to the Bar of the District of Columbia, he shall demonstrate his fitness to practice law.
As the Board noted, the record is skimpy as to the precise conduct for which respondent was disciplined in Maryland, but it appears to have involved neglect of fiduciary duties as attorney in fact for an incompetent individual and as guardian of a disabled person.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4954171. Public record. Not legal advice.