# Myerowitz v. Pathology Laboratory Diagnostics, Inc.

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · June 10, 1996 · 451 Pa. Super. 72

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4952819

## Case

- **Full name:** Richard L. MYEROWITZ, M.D. v. PATHOLOGY LABORATORY DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Carlos D. Bedetti, M.D., Nematollah Mirzabeigi, M.D., and Robert D. Tronzo, M.D
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** June 10, 1996
- **Citations:** 451 Pa. Super. 72; 678 A.2d 404; 1996 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1950
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Tamilia
- **Judges:** Brosky, Elliott, Tamilia
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4952819

## Opinion text

TAMILIA Judge,
dissenting:
I respectfully dissent. The majority misconstrues the effect of the claim for injunc-tive relief as to prevent irreparable harm. This is not the ease as the arbitrators can make the appellant whole financially or in damages if his colleagues have not acted properly. Because of the arbitration clause, the trial court lacks jurisdiction and cannot usurp the function of the arbitration board to grant the relief requested to render the function of arbitration in this case meaningless.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4952819. Public record. Not legal advice.