# Wine v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

> District of Columbia Court of Appeals · October 24, 1995 · 675 A.2d 1381

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4952679

## Case

- **Full name:** Roy E. WINE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POLICE AND FIREFIGHTERS' RETIREMENT AND RELIEF BOARD
- **Court:** District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** October 24, 1995
- **Citations:** 675 A.2d 1381; 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 295; 1995 WL 861071
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Newman
- **Judges:** Ferren, King, Newman
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4952679

## Opinion text

NEWMAN, Senior Judge:
Wine argues that the decision of the Board ordering his involuntary retirement based on non-service related disability lacks the requisite evidentiary support. We affirm.
The proceedings of the Board are set forth in its brief; we incorporate the same herein. On this record, there is sufficient evidence to support the Board’s holding that there was not a full time light duty job petitioner was capable of performing. Thus, based on the teachings of Price v. Police & Firefighters Retirement and Relief Bd., 542 A.2d 1249 (D.C.1988), we must affirm.
Accordingly, the decision appealed from herein is hereby affirmed.
So ordered.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4952679. Public record. Not legal advice.