# Feigley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · February 23, 1994 · 638 A.2d 193

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4949752

## Case

- **Full name:** George FEIGLEY v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** February 23, 1994
- **Citations:** 638 A.2d 193
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Docket, Due, Larsen, Montemuro, Pursuant, See, Unavailability
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4949752

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 1994, the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pau-peris is granted.
The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied. Insofar as the Petition for Review filed in the Commonwealth Court contained counts addressed to that court’s original jurisdiction, the Court has considered the Petitioner’s arguments as on direct appeal pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 723(a). There being no basis for ordering the relief requested, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.
MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1800, due to the unavailability of LARSEN, J., see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4949752. Public record. Not legal advice.