# Harvey v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

> District of Columbia Court of Appeals · January 15, 1991 · 584 A.2d 55

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4948747

## Case

- **Full name:** Jim HARVEY, R. Rochelle Burns v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, Janice Jackson, Intervenor
- **Court:** District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** January 15, 1991
- **Citations:** 584 A.2d 55; 1991 D.C. App. LEXIS 22; 1991 WL 8564
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Belson, Farrell, Ferren, Newman, Rogers, Schwelb, Steadman, Terry, Wagner
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4948747

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of respondent’s petition for rehearing en banc; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4948747. Public record. Not legal advice.