# Proctor v. Miller

> District of Columbia Court of Appeals · January 10, 1949 · 63 A.2d 665

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4942500

## Case

- **Full name:** PROCTOR v. MILLER
- **Court:** District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** January 10, 1949
- **Citations:** 63 A.2d 665; 1949 D.C. App. LEXIS 134
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Hood
- **Judges:** Cayton, Clagett, Hood
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4942500

## Opinion text

HOOD,Associate Judge,
(dissenting).
For the reasons stated in my dissents in Winkler v. Ballard, D.C.Mun.App., 63 A. 2d 660 , and Hall v. Ring Management Co., D.C.Mun.App., 63 A.2d 656 , I am not in agreement with the Court: Here, again, an order of the Administrator is reversed with little or no direction for his guidance in subsequent proceedings. I still believe the Court should decide whether the Administrator has any discretion in adjusting rent ceilings and, if so, the extent of that discretion. If he has no discretion then the Court should state clearly and distinctly the principles which must be followed by him in performing his duties in this type of proceeding.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4942500. Public record. Not legal advice.