# Ex parte Amos

> Supreme Court of Florida · January 11, 1927 · 93 Fla. 5

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4921853

## Case

- **Full name:** Ex Parte: Ernest Amos
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Florida
- **Decided:** January 11, 1927
- **Citations:** 93 Fla. 5; 112 So. 289; 1927 Fla. LEXIS 1058
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Strum
- **Judges:** Buford, Ellis, Strum, Whitfield
- **Cited by:** 69 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4921853

## Opinion text

Strum, J.
(dissenting):
I am unable to reconcile the majority opinion herein with the former opinion of this Court in Kirkland v. State, 86 Fla. 130 ; 97 South. Rep. 510 , in respect to the construction to be placed under Section 5354, Revised General Statutes 1920.
I therefore dissent, but express no opinion as to whether 'the indictment herein is good as against a motion to quash.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4921853. Public record. Not legal advice.