# Brown v. Tindel

> Supreme Court of Florida · November 18, 1922 · 84 Fla. 582

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4921137

## Case

- **Full name:** W. J. Brown and S. A. Brown v. Rebecca Tindel, Horace Tindel, Charlie Tindel and Claud Tindel, a Partnership Doing Business Under the Style and Firm Name of A. S. Tindel & Son
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Florida
- **Decided:** November 18, 1922
- **Citations:** 84 Fla. 582; 94 So. 336
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4921137

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J. concur.
Browne, C. J.,.not participating.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4921137. Public record. Not legal advice.
