# Brown v. State

> Court of Appeals of Texas · January 20, 1883 · 13 Tex. Ct. App. 347

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4906039

## Case

- **Full name:** Elza Brown v. State
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** January 20, 1883
- **Citations:** 13 Tex. Ct. App. 347; 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 9
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by White
- **Judges:** White
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4906039

## Opinion text

White, P. J.
In Williams v. The State, 12 Texas Ct. App., 395, and in repeated decisions since, it has been held that “the form for an indictment for theft prescribed by the Act of 1881, entitled ‘An Act to prescribe the forms of indictments in certain cases,’ charges no facts, acts, or omissions constituting the offense of theft, and is therefore repugnant to the Constitution of this State.”
This form is followed in the indictment before us; and under it appellant was tried and convicted for theft of two hundred and fifty dollars in money. Defendant’s counsel moved the court to quash the indictment, but the motion was overruled. In this the court erred. Because the indictment is fatally defective and charges no offense against the law, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.
Opinion rendered January 20, 1883.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4906039. Public record. Not legal advice.