# Cole v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · January 6, 1932 · 119 Tex. Crim. 1

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4898455

## Case

- **Full name:** Luke Cole v. State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** January 6, 1932
- **Citations:** 119 Tex. Crim. 1; 44 S.W.2d 722; 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing by Lattimore
- **Judges:** Hawkins, Lattimore
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4898455

## Opinion text

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Appellant insists that his confession was erroneously admitted, and sets out in his motion at some length the grounds of his complaint. The bill of exception complaining of the introduction of the confession is qualified by the trial court, and there seems no question but that the bill as qualified presents no error.
We think the complaint of the admission of the testimony of the wife properly disposed of in the original opinion and see no necessity for repeating or elaborating the views there expressed.
The motion for rehearing will be overruled.
Overruled.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4898455. Public record. Not legal advice.