# Brown v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · September 14, 2012 · 97 So. 3d 321

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4877137

## Case

- **Full name:** Tanesha BROWN v. STATE of Florida
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** September 14, 2012
- **Citations:** 97 So. 3d 321; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15451; 2012 WL 4033649
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Cohen, Evander, Lawson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4877137

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s pro se motion to remove injunction. As the State correctly observes, the sentencing documents in the instant case do not contain any injunction/“no-contact” provisions.
AFFIRMED.
LAWSON, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4877137. Public record. Not legal advice.