# Hein v. Fuller

> Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · April 13, 2012 · 93 So. 3d 961

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4876074

## Case

- **Full name:** Stacey Mallette FULLER n/k/a Stacey Mallette Hein v. Abel FULLER
- **Court:** Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** April 13, 2012
- **Citations:** 93 So. 3d 961; 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 93; 2012 WL 1237758
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Bryan
- **Judges:** Bryan, Moore, Only, Pittman, Thomas, Thompson, Writing
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4876074

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that the language of Rule 32(B)(7)(e) specifically acknowledged that family or dependent coverage could include children who are not the subject of the child-support obligation but still required “that the ‘actual amount of the total insurance premium’ be used in th…
- concluding Canada, not Alabama, was the child’s home state and “the trial court in Alabama lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to make an initial child custody determination”
- discussing the inclusion of the cost of health-insurance coverage in a child-support determination

## Opinion text

BRYAN, Judge,
concurring in the result only.
Regarding the main opinion, I concur in the result only. However, I agree with the sentiments expressed by Judge Moore in his special writing.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4876074. Public record. Not legal advice.