# Oracle Oil, LLC v. EPI Consultants

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · September 14, 2011 · 2011 La.App. 1 Cir. 0151

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4869533

## Case

- **Full name:** ORACLE OIL, LLC v. EPI CONSULTANTS, a DIVISION OF CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL, INC.
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** September 14, 2011
- **Citations:** 2011 La.App. 1 Cir. 0151; 77 So. 3d 64; 2011 La. App. LEXIS 1042; 2011 WL 4336998
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by McClendon
- **Judges:** McClendon, Pettigrew, Welch
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4869533

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- observing that “[t]he date on which prescription begins to run is a factual issue to be determined by the trier of fact”

## Opinion text

McCLENDON, J.,
concurs and assigns reasons.
hi agree with the majority’s analysis regarding its discussion of Civil Code Article 2493. Thus, I find it unnecessary to address the issue of contra non valentem. Accordingly, I respectfully concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4869533. Public record. Not legal advice.