# Brown v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · December 23, 2011 · 76 So. 3d 1074

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4868905

## Case

- **Full name:** James BROWN v. STATE of Florida
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** December 23, 2011
- **Citations:** 76 So. 3d 1074; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20496; 2011 WL 6438616
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Evander, Monaco, Orfinger
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4868905

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Escobedo v. State, 561 So.2d 429, 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (“Whatever the merits of the claim, it cannot now be considered because, when the *1075 trial judge explicitly offered the defendant a mistrial on this ground below, defense counsel just as specifically withdrew the motion. It is therefore plain that the identical contention may not now be resurrected as a basis for reversal only after the jury has returned an unwelcome verdict.”).
ORFINGER, C.J., MONACO and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4868905. Public record. Not legal advice.