# North River Insurance Co. v. Overton

> Supreme Court of Alabama · June 11, 2010 · 59 So. 3d 1

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4863924

## Case

- **Full name:** The NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. Allen M. OVERTON and Cindy Waldrop
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** June 11, 2010
- **Citations:** 59 So. 3d 1; 2010 Ala. LEXIS 98; 2010 WL 2342415
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Murdock
- **Judges:** Bolin, Cobb, Lyons, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Smith, Stuart, Woodall
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4863924

## Opinion text

MURDOCK, Justice
(concurring in the result).
I cannot agree with the statement in the main opinion that the record contained “no substantial evidence that Blythe was an agent of North River.” 59 So.3d at 12 (emphasis added). As to the issue of actual agency, it is enough to reach the conclusion that the summary judgment in favor of Overton and Waldrop was inappropriate that we are able to state that the record before the trial court did contain substantial evidence that Blythe was not an actual agent of North River.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4863924. Public record. Not legal advice.