# In re Stanford

> Supreme Court of Louisiana · December 17, 2010 · 50 So. 3d 151

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4861466

## Case

- **Full name:** In re Daniel James STANFORD
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Louisiana
- **Decided:** December 17, 2010
- **Citations:** 50 So. 3d 151; 2010 La. LEXIS 2830; 2010 WL 5129837
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Guidry
- **Judges:** Docket, Grant, Guidry, Johnson, Kimball, Matter, Reasons
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4861466

## Opinion text

GUIDRY, J.,
dissents.
|,I do not agree that respondent’s misconduct is prescribed and that the formal charges should be dismissed. Rather, I would reject respondent’s prescription defense and impose a public reprimand.
Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4861466. Public record. Not legal advice.