# R.O. v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · October 20, 2010 · 46 So. 3d 124

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4860286

## Case

- **Full name:** R.O., a juvenile v. The STATE of Florida
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** October 20, 2010
- **Citations:** 46 So. 3d 124; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15827
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Cope
- **Judges:** Cope, Gersten, Wells
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4860286

## Opinion text

COPE, J.
(dissenting).
We should affirm. The defense did not make any objection in the trial court that the judge had departed from neutrality. The only objection was that the trial *127 court’s questions had broadened the scope of direct examination. The point is not preserved for appellate review. See Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701, 703 (Fla.1978).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4860286. Public record. Not legal advice.