# Brown v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · September 18, 2017 · 226 So. 3d 376

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4845960

## Case

- **Full name:** Jarmal N. BROWN v. STATE of Florida
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** September 18, 2017
- **Citations:** 226 So. 3d 376; 2017 WL 4103218
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Curium
- **Judges:** Curium, Lambert, Palmer, Wallis
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4845960

## Opinion text

PER CURIUM. In ■ this Anders 1 ■ appeal, Jarmal N. Brown (the defendant) appeals his judgment and sentence. We affirm because the defendant pled no contest and his sentence is legal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b). However, the judgment contains a scrivener’s error that must be corrected.
The defendant pled no contest to two offenses, including burglary- of an occupied structure under section 810.02(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2016),, but his judgment reflects a conviction for burglary of an occupied structure under section 810.02(3)(d). Accordingly,- we remand for correction of the judgment to reflect the defendant’s actual conviction. See Johnson v. State, 84 So.3d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER’S ERROR.
PALMER, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4845960. Public record. Not legal advice.