# State ex rel. Brown v. State

> Supreme Court of Louisiana · October 16, 2017 · 226 So. 3d 1114

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4845896

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE EX REL. Joseph BROWN v. STATE of Louisiana
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Louisiana
- **Decided:** October 16, 2017
- **Citations:** 226 So. 3d 1114; 2017 WL 4641348
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4845896

## Opinion text

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS
PER CURIAM: |,WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.
Relator has now exhausted the right to obtain post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244 , Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator has filed an application for post-conviction relief in the district court, and the district court’s ruling denying relief is now final. Hereafter, unless relator can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted the right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per cu-riam.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4845896. Public record. Not legal advice.