# Ducote v. Boleware

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · February 17, 2016 · 2015 La.App. 4 Cir. 0764

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4838153

## Case

- **Full name:** Wardette DUCOTE v. Michael BOLEWARE
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** February 17, 2016
- **Citations:** 2015 La.App. 4 Cir. 0764; 216 So. 3d 934; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 262
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing by Ledet
- **Judges:** Jenkins, Ledet, Lobrano
- **Cited by:** 23 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4838153

## Opinion text

REHEARING GRANTED FOR CLARIFICATION
(Court composed of Judge JOY COSSICH LOBRANO, Judge ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge SANDRA CABRINA JENKINS).
ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge.
|TWe grant the application for rehearing for clarification purposes only. As War-dette Ducote correctly points out in her application for rehearing, the New Orleans ordinances cited in our original opinion are not the ordinances in effect on the date of the accident. Nonetheless, even under the ordinances in effect on the date of the accident, the result in this case remains the same. Therefore, our original opinion remains unchanged.
REHEARING GRANTED FOR CLARIFICATION; JUDGMENT UNCHANGED
LOBRANO, J., dissents with reasons.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4838153. Public record. Not legal advice.