# W.F. v. State

> Supreme Court of Alabama · October 30, 2015 · 214 So. 3d 1153

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4836475

## Case

- **Full name:** Ex parte W.F., W.L.C., and R.J.J. (In re W.F., W.L.C., and R.J.J. v. State of Alabama)
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** October 30, 2015
- **Citations:** 214 So. 3d 1153
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Murdock
- **Judges:** Bolin, Bryan, Main, Moore, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Stuart, Wise
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4836475

## Opinion text

MURDOCK, Justice
(concurring in the result).
The elements of illegal hunting (or attempted illegal hunting) as described in Rogers v. State, 491 So.2d 987 (Ala.Crim.App.1985), do not equate to the elements of the offenses described in §§ 9-11-235 and 9-11-257, Ala.Code 1975, and Rule 220-2-11(1), Ala. Admin. Code (Department of Conservation and Natural Resources), specifically in relation to the elements of intent and an overt act. I agree that this Court should not follow Rogers . I concur in the result reached by the main opinion in this case.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4836475. Public record. Not legal advice.