# Ex parte Interstate Freight USA, Inc.

> Supreme Court of Alabama · June 24, 2016 · 213 So. 3d 560

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4836037

## Case

- **Full name:** Ex parte INTERSTATE FREIGHT USA, INC. (In re Kevin L. Vogler v. Interstate Freight USA, Inc.)
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** June 24, 2016
- **Citations:** 213 So. 3d 560
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Murdock
- **Judges:** Bolin, Bryan, Main, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Stuart, Wise
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4836037

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating, on petition for a writ of mandamus, that, "[b]ecause the petitioners' answer and counterclaim were not before the trial court at the time it ruled on the motion for a change of venue, we will not consider the answer and counterclaim or any argument based on those plea…

## Opinion text

MURDOCK, Justice
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. See, e.g., Ex parte Wachovia Bank, 77 So.3d 570, 576-78 (Ala.2011) (Murdock, J., dissenting).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4836037. Public record. Not legal advice.