# Brown v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · January 4, 2017 · 211 So. 3d 48

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4835082

## Case

- **Full name:** Alexander Leo BROWN v. STATE of Florida
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** January 4, 2017
- **Citations:** 211 So. 3d 48; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 88
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Ciklin, Conner, Gerber
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4835082

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
Alexánder Brown appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Without reaching the merits of Brown’s claim, we find that the motion was impermissibly successive because Brown has filed several prior rule 3.850 motions and he failed to allege good cause for his failure to assert the instant claim in his previous motions. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(h)(2). We therefore affirm the trial court’s summary denial of the motion.
Affirmed.
Ciklin, C.J., Gerber and Conner, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4835082. Public record. Not legal advice.