# Van Pelt v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · August 14, 2015 · 202 So. 3d 707

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4829679

## Case

- **Full name:** Kim VAN PELT v. STATE of Alabama
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** August 14, 2015
- **Citations:** 202 So. 3d 707; 2015 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 66
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Joiner
- **Judges:** Burke, Joiner, Kellum, Welch, Windom
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4829679

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that, because the witness's testimony was admissible, "trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the testimony"

## Opinion text

JOINER, Judge,
concurring in part and concurring in the result in part.
I concur in all aspects of the Court’s opinion except Parts II.E.4-II.E.6, II.E.10, II.E.15, and II.F; as to those parts I concur in the result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4829679. Public record. Not legal advice.