# State v. Ford

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 18, 2016 · 193 So. 3d 1242

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4827757

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Louisiana v. Glenn FORD
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** May 18, 2016
- **Citations:** 193 So. 3d 1242; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 1002; 2016 WL 3057519
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Brown
- **Judges:** Bleich, Brown, Drew, Garrett, Hoc, Moore
- **Cited by:** 12 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4827757

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining “the entirety of the evidence, whether admitted at the underlying trial or excluded, is properly considered in the determination of factual innocence…”

## Opinion text

BROWN, C.J.,
concurring in the Opinion on Rehearing Grant.
hi agree with the majority opinion and with Judge Drew’s concurring view. The evidence as presented supports Ford’s *1257 guilt of second degree murder and that his connection was certainly not “tangential.”
DREW, J., concurs with reasons on rehearing.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4827757. Public record. Not legal advice.