# McDaniel v. Ezell

> Supreme Court of Alabama · January 30, 2015 · 177 So. 3d 454

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4822837

## Case

- **Full name:** Keith McDANIEL v. William T. EZELL City of Florence, Alabama, a municipal corporation, and the Civil Service Board of the City of Florence v. William T. Ezell
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** January 30, 2015
- **Citations:** 177 So. 3d 454; 2015 WL 403076
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Moore
- **Judges:** Bolin, Bryan, Main, Moore, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Stuart, Wise
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4822837

## Opinion text

MOORE, Chief Justice
(concurring in the result).
I concur in the result because I believe the defect in William T. Ezell’s appeal to the circuit court was not that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain Ezell’s appeal on the basis that he did not have a right to appeal but that Ezell *459 failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4822837. Public record. Not legal advice.