# Magee v. Boyd

> Supreme Court of Alabama · March 2, 2015 · 175 So. 3d 79

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4822276

## Case

- **Full name:** Julie P. MAGEE and Thomas L. White, Jr., in their official capacities as Commissioner of Revenue and Comptroller of the State of Alabama, respectively v. Daniel BOYD Rachell Prince v. Daniel Boyd Tequila Rogers v. Daniel Boyd
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** March 2, 2015
- **Citations:** 175 So. 3d 79; 2015 WL 867926
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Bryan
- **Judges:** Bolin, Bryan, Justicé, Main, Moore, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Stuart, Wise
- **Cited by:** 16 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4822276

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that “an amended bill or a substitute bill, if germane to and not inconsistent with the general purpose of the original bill, does not have to be read three times on three different days to comply with [the three readings requirement]”
- holding that whether the legislature satisfied constitutionally mandated procedural requirements for enacting new laws is justiciable
- recognizing the judiciary's function as the "ultimate interpreter of the Alabama Constitution"

## Opinion text

BRYAN, Justice
(concurring in part and concurring in the result in case nos. 1130987 and 1131021).
I concur in all aspects of the main opinion, except for Parts II and IV, as to which I concur in the. result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4822276. Public record. Not legal advice.