# Denson v. Bronner

> Supreme Court of Alabama · December 31, 2014 · 171 So. 3d 614

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4821340

## Case

- **Full name:** Ex parte David BRONNER, in his official capacities as chief executive officer and secretary-treasurer of the Employees' Retirement System of Alabama and as chief executive officer and secretary-treasurer of the Teachers' Retirement System of Alabama (In re Tonya Denson and Venius Turner v. David Bronner)
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** December 31, 2014
- **Citations:** 171 So. 3d 614; 2014 WL 7403996
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Shaw
- **Judges:** Bolin, Bryan, Himself, Main, Moore, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Stuart, Wise
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4821340

## Opinion text

SHAW, Justice
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. The motion to dismiss in this case raised numerous complex issues. .Given that fact and the trial court’s holding that “[t]hese issues should be presented to the court on a motion for summary judgment with supporting materials and law,” I believe that it is premature to hold at this early juncture in the case that Ala. Const. 1901, art. I, § 14, bars this action or that any potential remedy would violate Ala. Const. 1901, art. Ill, § 43.
MOORE, C.J., concurs.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4821340. Public record. Not legal advice.