# Guillot v. Guillot

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · December 23, 2014 · 14 La.App. 3 Cir. 364

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4818604

## Case

- **Full name:** Wayne GUILLOT, et ux. v. Reece GUILLOT, et ux.
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** December 23, 2014
- **Citations:** 14 La.App. 3 Cir. 364; 161 So. 3d 841; 2014 La. App. LEXIS 3065; 2014 WL 7264510
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Amy
- **Judges:** Amy, Conery, Cooks
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4818604

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that the plaintiffs consent is a defense to intentional battery

## Opinion text

AMY, J.,
concurring.
| J join in the majority opinion’s affirmation of the underlying judgment, finding no manifest error in the jury’s factual findings or legal error in the jury charges and/or verdict form.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4818604. Public record. Not legal advice.