# Holloway Drilling Equipment, Inc. v. Bodin

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · November 26, 2014 · 14 La.App. 3 Cir. 248

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4816609

## Case

- **Full name:** HOLLOWAY DRILLING EQUIPMENT, INC. v. Danielle BODIN
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** November 26, 2014
- **Citations:** 14 La.App. 3 Cir. 248; 154 So. 3d 713; 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2851; 2014 WL 6676239
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Amy
- **Judges:** Amy, Conery, Cooks, Genovese, Peters
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4816609

## Opinion text

AMY, J.,
dissenting.
|,1 respectfully dissent from the majority opinion as I would affirm the trial court’s ruling on the exception of res judicata in light of Holloway Drilling Equipment, Inc. v. Bodin, 12-355 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/7/12) , 107 So.3d 699 , writ not considered, 13-251 (La.3/8/13), 109 So.3d 353 . Given the broad language of the receipt and release agreement, as discussed in that underlying appeal, I find no distinction between the earlier proceeding and this matter brought against the defendant in his individual capacity.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4816609. Public record. Not legal advice.