# Alabama Board of Examiners in Psychology v. Hamilton

> Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · September 27, 2013 · 150 So. 3d 1085

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4815121

## Case

- **Full name:** ALABAMA BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN PSYCHOLOGY v. C. Fletcher HAMILTON, PhD.
- **Court:** Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** September 27, 2013
- **Citations:** 150 So. 3d 1085; 2013 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 214; 2013 WL 5394840
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Pittman
- **Judges:** Donaldson, Moore, Pittman, Thomas, Thompson, Writing
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4815121

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that, in an appeal of an agency decision under the Alabama Administrative Procedure Act, codified at Ala. Code 1975, § 41-22-1 et seq„ the administrative-law judge is entitled to deference based, in part, on his or her superior ability to observe the witnesses’ demeano…

## Opinion text

PITTMAN, Judge,
concurring in part and concurring in the result.
I concur in the result to reverse the circuit court’s judgment, and I concur in the main opinion except to the extent that it concludes that a failure of an administrative agency to apply the common-law rule of repose in an appropriate case is not an “error of law” that can be corrected via reversal of the agency’s decision in a judicial-review proceeding under the authority of Ala.Code 1975, § 41-22-20(k)(5). I am persuaded that reversal in this case is proper, however, based upon the apparent alternative rationale suggested in the main opinion that agencies of the state should, in certain circumstances, be entitled to avoid any effect that the rule of repose might otherwise have when such agencies are seeking to address violations of laws designed to protect the public welfare, and especially when, as in this case, those agencies act in a prompt manner upon first receiving notice of a violation of those laws.
THOMAS, J., concurs.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4815121. Public record. Not legal advice.