# Chevaldina v. R.K./FL Management, Inc.

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · February 5, 2014 · 133 So. 3d 1086

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4809078

## Case

- **Full name:** Irina CHEVALDINA v. R.K./FL MANAGEMENT, INC.
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** February 5, 2014
- **Citations:** 133 So. 3d 1086; 42 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1224; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1436; 2014 WL 443977
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Shepherd
- **Judges:** Rothenberg, Salter, Shepherd
- **Cited by:** 25 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4809078

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that the order fails because neither it nor “the transcript of the hearing on the motion provide any such specific findings”
- recognizing availability of injunctive relief where plaintiffs alleged intentional interference with advantageous business relationships

## Opinion text

SHEPHERD, C.J.,
concurring.
I concur in the majority opinion. I write only to emphasize that the alleged claims for damages in this case for defamation, tortious interference, and invasion of privacy arise solely out of alleged nefarious blog postings by the appellant. Proof of harm in a case where, as here, the claimant is alleging potential customers or tenants did not contact them is difficult. See Murtagh v. Hurley, 40 So.3d 62, 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Individual identification of customers who did not call or walk into a claimant’s place of business may not always be necessary. Id. at 65-66 . In *1093 this case, however, we need not concern ourselves with this type of conundrum. R.K. Associates stipulated at the injunction hearing that there were substantially no vacancies in any of their rented space. This is a sufficient basis on which to reverse the injunction in this case.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4809078. Public record. Not legal advice.