# In re Guste

> Supreme Court of Louisiana · December 4, 2012 · 118 So. 3d 1023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4802824

## Case

- **Full name:** In re Katherine M. GUSTE
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Louisiana
- **Decided:** December 4, 2012
- **Citations:** 118 So. 3d 1023; 2012 La. LEXIS 3271; 2012 WL 6015579
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Weimer
- **Judges:** Guidry, Reasons, Weimer
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4802824

## Opinion text

WEIMER, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
^Because this matter represents a res novo issue and there is insufficient evidence to establish Mr. Perniciaro was incapacitated, I believe a less harsh sanction would adequately serve the interests of the disciplinary system.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4802824. Public record. Not legal advice.