# State v. Hamilton

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · November 7, 2012 · 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 204

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4797373

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Louisiana v. Jody D. HAMILTON
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** November 7, 2012
- **Citations:** 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 204; 103 So. 3d 705; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1375; 2012 WL 5416979
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Amy
- **Judges:** Amy, Cooks, Keaty
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4797373

## Opinion text

AMY, J.,
dissenting.
hi respectfully dissent from the majority’s determination to vacate the defendant’s convictions and sentences. Certainly, it is the trial court’s duty to see that the court reporter makes a true, complete and accurate record of the trial. State v. Pinion, 06-2346 (La.10/26/07), 968 So.2d 131 . However, in this case, the voir dire transcript contained within the record permits a review of the appropriateness of the trial court’s denials of the defendant’s challenges for cause. State v. Campbell 06-0286 (La.5/21/08), 983 So.2d 810 , cert. denied, 555 U.S. 1040 , 129 S.Ct. 607 , 172 L.Ed.2d 471 (2008). In this light, and given that the defendant’s contention that the cited omissions from the record would reveal a possible pattern of disparate treatment is only speculative in nature, I find that a reversal is not required.
For this reason, I respectfully dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4797373. Public record. Not legal advice.