# Vanhorn v. Nestoss

> Washington Supreme Court · January 9, 1918 · 99 Wash. 328

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4736089

## Case

- **Full name:** Mary Jane Vanhorn v. Henry R. Nestoss
- **Court:** Washington Supreme Court
- **Decided:** January 9, 1918
- **Citations:** 99 Wash. 328; 169 P. 807
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Parker
- **Judges:** Main, Parker
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4736089

## Opinion text

Parker, J.
(dissenting)—I am unable to concur in the view entertained by my brethren in the foregoing opinion that the superior court was without jurisdiction because it did not require the guardian to give a bond upon his appointment. The court may have erred in failing to require such bond, and it may have also abused its discretion in failing to require of the guardian a bond upon the granting of the order of sale, but I think these errors did not constitute such irregularities as to prevent the court having jurisdiction over the estate, in view of the provisions of Rem. Code, 11693, quoted in the opinion.
I therefore dissent.
Mount, J., concurs with Parker, J.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4736089. Public record. Not legal advice.