# State v. Rhone

> Washington Supreme Court · April 1, 2010 · 168 Wash. 2d 645

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4714345

## Case

- **Full name:** The State of Washington v. Theodore R. Rhone
- **Court:** Washington Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 1, 2010
- **Citations:** 168 Wash. 2d 645
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Madsen
- **Judges:** Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst, Johnson, Madsen, Owens, Sanders, Stephens
- **Cited by:** 29 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4714345

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting Batson did not transform “a shield against discrimination into a sword cutting against the purpose of a peremptory challenge”

## Opinion text

Madsen, C.J.
¶21 (concurring) — I agree with the lead opinion in this case. However, going forward, I agree with the rule advocated by the dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4714345. Public record. Not legal advice.