# Jerome Brown v. Fernando Galindo

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 21, 2021

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4697263

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 21, 2021
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4697263

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2264

JEROME JULIUS BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CLERK FERNANDO GALINDO, Eastern District of Virginia; JAMES IRVING,
Registered Agent for Southern Management; JOHN FARNUM, Miles and
Stockbridge Deceased Attorneys; IVAN D. DAVIS, Magistrate Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:20-cv-01329-LMB-MSN)

Submitted: June 11, 2021 Decided: June 21, 2021

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We

have reviewed the record and Brown’s briefs on appeal, and we conclude that this appeal

is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32 (1992);

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324-25 (1989). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4697263. Public record. Not legal advice.
