# Biancalana, Joseph Agostino Iv

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · March 17, 2021

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4670057

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** March 17, 2021
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4670057

## Opinion text

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-92,181-01

EX PARTE JOSEPH AGOSTINO BIANCALANA, IV, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. A18719-1 IN THE 216TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM KERR COUNTY

Per curiam. KELLER , P.J., filed a concurring opinion in which HERVEY and
SLAUGHTER , JJ., joined. YEARY , J., concurred.

OPINION

Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated kidnapping in this case. At the same time, he pleaded

guilty to charges of tampering with evidence also from Kerr County, and aggravated kidnapping,

possession of a controlled substance and aggravated robbery from Gillespie County. Applicant was

sentenced to twenty-eight years’ imprisonment for each of the aggravated kidnapping charges and

the aggravated robbery charge, ten years’ imprisonment for the tampering with evidence charge, and

two years’ state jail for the possession of a controlled substance charge, all to run concurrently. He

did not appeal his convictions. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the

county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC .
2

art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his convictions for aggravated kidnapping from

both Gillespie and Kerr Counties based on the same acts violate the prohibition on double jeopardy.

Based on the record, the trial court has determined that Applicant’s two convictions for

aggravated kidnapping involving the same acts violate the prohibition on double jeopardy. The trial

court has determined that Applicant’s other grounds for review are without merit. We agree.

Relief is granted. Ervin v. State, 991 S.W.2d 804, 817 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). The

judgment of the 216th Judicial District Court of Kerr County in Cause No. A18719 is set aside. All

other relief is denied. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: March 17, 2021
Do not publish

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4670057. Public record. Not legal advice.