# Miller v. Secretary of Health and Human Services > United States Court of Federal Claims · March 4, 2021 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4664830 ## Case - **Court:** United States Court of Federal Claims - **Decided:** March 4, 2021 - **Precedential status:** Unpublished - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Judges:** Brian H. Corcoran - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4664830 ## Opinion text In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-0450V UNPUBLISHED MICHELLE A. MILLER, also known as Chief Special Master Corcoran MICHELLE MILLER GORSKI, Filed: January 27, 2021 Petitioner, v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Damages Decision Based on Proffer; SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder HUMAN SERVICES, Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Respondent. John L. DeFazio, Viola Cummings and Lindsay, LLP, Niagara Falls, NY, for Petitioner. Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On March 26, 2019, Michelle A. Miller filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered “left shoulder impingement syndrome” and “Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit” that was caused-in-fact by an influenza (“flu”) vaccine that was administered on October 3, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On January 22, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On January 26, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $47,861.54, 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). (comprised of $47,500.00 for pain and suffering and $361.54 for unreimbursed out-of- pocket medical expenses). Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $47,861.54 (comprised of $47,500.00 for pain and suffering, and $361.54 for unreimbursed out-of-pocket medical expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS MICHELLE A. MILLER, aka MICHELLE MILLER GORSKI, Petitioner, No. 19-450V Chief Special Master Corcoran v. ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Procedural History and Items of Compensation On January 21, 2021, respondent filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, and concededed that entitlement to compensation was appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. Thereafter, on January 22, 2021, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for her left Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $47,861.54, which is comprised of damages for pain and suffering in the amount of $47,500.00, and damages for unreimbursed out-of-pocket medical expenses in the amount of $361.54. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees. 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering. II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $47,861.54, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Acting Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division DARRYL R. WISHARD Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ Mallori B. Openchowski MALLORI B. OPENCHOWSKI Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-0146 Tel.: (202) 305-0660 DATED: January 26, 2021 --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4664830. Public record. Not legal advice.