# Tousek v. Commissioner

> United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 20, 1925 · 1 B.T.A. 1164

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4627148

## Case

- **Full name:** Appeal of E. B. TOUSEK.
- **Court:** United States Board of Tax Appeals
- **Decided:** May 20, 1925
- **Citations:** 1 B.T.A. 1164; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2649
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Marquette, Ivins, Morris
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4627148

## Opinion text

Appeal of E. B. TOUSEK.
Tousek v. Commissioner
Docket No. 1497.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1 B.T.A. 1164 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2649 ;
May 20, 1925 , decided Submitted April 15, 1925 .
*2649 Upon the evidence, held, that the amount received by the taxpayer in 1920 from A. G. Spalding & Brothers, Inc., was compensation, and not a gift.
Henry Varay, C.P.A., for the taxpayer.
J. Arthur Adams, Esq., for the Commissioner.
MORRIS
*1164 Before IVINS, MARQUETTE, and MORRIS.
FINDINGS OF FACT.
1. From 1899 to January 20, 1920, the taxpayer was in the continuous employ of A. G. Spalding & Brothers, Inc., being an executive officer and acting in the capacity of comptroller and assistant treasurer during the last ten years. He did not have a written contract of employment at any time. In 1919 his regular salary was $10,000 and he received a bonus at the end of the year of $2,000.
*1165 2. On January 21, 1920, while proceeding to his place of business, he collapsed in the street, and was thereafter confined to his home under the care of a physician for a period of two years.
3. Some time during 1920 his resignation was requested, but he remained on the pay roll throughout the year, receiving $500 semimonthly, making a total of $12,000.
4. For the year 1920 the taxpayer forwarded to the collector for his district *2650 Form 1040, partially executed, to which was attached a statement setting forth the receipt of the $12,000, and giving as the reason for his failure to include the same in his gross income, that it was in the nature of a gift, as he rendered no services after January 20 of that year. The Commissioner included the amount in the taxpayer's gross income, assessed a tax of $754.17 and rejected his claim in abatement under date of November 28, 1924, from which this appeal is taken.
DECISION.
The determination of the Commissioner is approved.
OPINION.
MORRIS: It is our opinion that the amount received by the taxpayer in 1920 from A. G. Spalding & Brothers, Inc., was compensation and not a gift. See .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4627148. Public record. Not legal advice.