# Faroll-Bittel Co. v. Commissioner

> United States Board of Tax Appeals · January 31, 1925 · 1 B.T.A. 467

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4608031

## Case

- **Full name:** Appeal of FAROLL-BITTEL COMPANY.
- **Court:** United States Board of Tax Appeals
- **Decided:** January 31, 1925
- **Citations:** 1 B.T.A. 467; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2886
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** James, Steenhagen, Trttssell, Trammell
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4608031

## Opinion text

Appeal of FAROLL-BITTEL COMPANY.
Faroll-Bittel Co. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 737.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1 B.T.A. 467 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2886 ;
January 31, 1925 , decided Submitted December 18, 1924 .
*2886 Forest D. Siefkin, Esq., for the taxpayer.
J. A. Adams, Esq. (Nelson T. Hartson, Solicitor of Internal Revenue) for the Commissioner.
*467 Before JAMES, STERNHAGEN, TRAMMELL, and TRUSSELL.
This appeal is submitted for determination upon the petition of the taxpayer and the answer of the Commissioner.
The taxpayer received a deficiency letter dated October 15, 1924, asserting a deficiency in taxes for the years 1919 and 1920. The taxpayer appealed to the Board with a petition setting forth the grounds upon which it claimed the right to classification as a personal service corporation during the two years named. Thereupon the Commissioner filed his answer, admitting the allegation that the taxpayer was, during the year 1919 and during the period from January 1, 1920, to October 31, 1920, a personal service corporation within the meaning of section 200 of the Revenue Act of 1918, and that there is no deficiency in tax for said periods.
DECISION.
The deficiencies in tax, as originally determined by the Commissioner, are disallowed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4608031. Public record. Not legal advice.