# Dansard v. Commissioner

> United States Board of Tax Appeals · October 20, 1926 · 5 B.T.A. 130

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4590957

## Case

- **Full name:** APPEAL OF BOYEZ DANSARD.
- **Court:** United States Board of Tax Appeals
- **Decided:** October 20, 1926
- **Citations:** 5 B.T.A. 130; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2960
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Sternhagen
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4590957

## Opinion text

APPEAL OF BOYEZ DANSARD.
Dansard v. Commissioner
Docket No. 6318.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
5 B.T.A. 130 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2960 ;
October 20, 1926 , Decided
*2960 Arnold R. Baar, Esq., for the petitioner.
B. G. Simpich, Esq., for the Commissioner.
STERNHAGEN
*130 Deficiency of $19.73 income tax for the calendar year 1924.
FINDINGS OF FACT.
The petitioner is an individual residing at Monroe, Mich. He was a member of a partnership which kept its books and made its partnership return on the basis of a fiscal year beginning May 1, 1923, and ending April 30, 1924.
The petitioner filed an individual income-tax return for the calendar year 1924, including therein the amount of $1,344.58, which was his distributive share of the partnership income for its fiscal year. Eight hundred and seventy-six dollars and ninety cents of this amount was his portion of the partnership income attributable to the year 1923.
In computing the tax the Commissioner applied the rates imposed by the Revenue Act of 1921 to $876.90 without making an allowance of 25 per cent under section 1200 of the Revenue Act of 1924.
OPINION.
STERNHAGEN: The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by *2961 .
Judgment will be entered for the Commissioner.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4590957. Public record. Not legal advice.