# Seiferth, Stephen v. Ingles Markets, Inc. > Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · November 4, 2015 · 2015 TN WC App. 39 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4559233 ## Case - **Court:** Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board - **Decided:** November 4, 2015 - **Citations:** 2015 TN WC App. 39 - **Precedential status:** Published - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Judges:** Marshall L. Davidson III, David F. Hensley, Timothy W. Conner - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4559233 ## Opinion text TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Robin Moore ) Docket No. 2015-02-0193 ) State File No. 47827-2015 v. ) ) Ingles Markets, Inc. ) ) and ) ) Stephen Seiferth ) Docket No. 2015-02-0183 ) State File No. 46930-2015 v. ) ) Ingles Markets, Inc. ) ) Appeals from the Court of Workers’ ) Compensation Claims ) Brian K. Addington, Judge ) Affirmed and Remanded — Filed November 4, 2015 In these consolidated interlocutory appeals, the employees alleged respiratory injuries as a result of repeated exposure to pesticide sprayed in their work areas. 1 The employer provided an initial evaluation at an emergency room but did not provide a panel of physicians in either case. The employer subsequently denied the claims and any further workers’ compensation benefits. Following expedited hearings, the trial court determined that the employees were entitled to a panel of physicians. Temporary disability benefits were denied. The employer has appealed. We affirm and remand the cases for any further proceedings that may be necessary. 1 These companion cases are factually and legally similar and, therefore, we have consolidated them for purposes of appeal. See generally Tenn. R. App. P. 16(b) (“When separate appeals involving a common question of law or common facts are pending before the appellate court, the appeals may be consolidated by order of the appellate court on its own motion or on motion of a party.”). 1 Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board, in which Judge David F. Hensley and Judge Timothy W. Conner joined. Judith A. DePrisco, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the employer-appellant, Ingles Markets, Inc. Robin Moore, Bluff City, Tennessee, employee-appellee, pro se Stephen Seiferth, Johnson City, Tennessee, employee-appellee, pro se Factual and Procedural Background Robin Moore and Stephen Seiferth (collectively “Employees”) worked in the dairy department at Ingles Markets, Inc. (“Employer”). 2 They alleged that Employer installed pesticide sprayers in their work areas that sprayed “fly spray” in fifteen-minute intervals, resulting in their being exposed to airborne chemicals while at work. Employees claimed that they suffered a variety of respiratory and neurological problems as a result of the exposure, and they filed separate petitions to compel Employer to provide medical treatment, payment of past medical expenses, and temporary disability benefits. After an expedited hearing was held in each case, the trial court ordered Employer to provide a panel of physicians to each Employee. The trial court denied temporary disability benefits in each case. Employer has appealed. Analysis In each notice of appeal, Employer contends that Employee failed to establish causation and that the “testimony indicated no further medical treatment is necessary: date of injury remains disputed.” However, we have been provided with no record of any testimony presented during the expedited hearings. Moreover, no statement of the evidence has been filed. Thus, the totality of the evidence introduced in the trial court is unknown, and we decline to speculate as to the nature and extent of the proof presented to the trial court. Instead, consistent with established Tennessee law, we presume that the trial court’s rulings were supported by sufficient evidence. See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994) (“In the absence of a transcript or a statement of the evidence, we must conclusively presume that every fact admissible under the pleadings was found or should have been found favorably to the appellee.”). 2 Because transcripts of the hearings were not provided by the appellant in these cases, we have gleaned the facts from the pleadings and the trial court’s expedited hearing orders. 2 In addition, although Employer states in each notice of appeal that the “date of injury remains disputed,” there is no indication in either of the trial court’s orders that this issue was raised or decided at the expedited hearings and, without a transcript, we decline to speculate one way or the other. Further, Employer has not filed a brief or position statement explaining or otherwise developing this issue. As stated by the Tennessee Supreme Court, “[i]t is not the role of the courts, trial or appellate, to research or construct a litigant’s case or arguments for him or her, and where a party fails to develop an argument in support of his or her contention or merely constructs a skeletal argument, the issue is waived.” Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010). Consistent with this settled principle, we decline to address the issue. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the trial court’s decision in each case is affirmed. The cases are remanded for any further proceedings that may be necessary. 3 TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Robin Moore ) Docket No. 2015-02-0193 ) State File No. 47827-2015 v. ) ) Ingles Markets, Inc. ) ) and ) ) Stephen Seiferth ) Docket No. 2015-02-0183 ) State File No. 46930-2015 v. ) ) Ingles Markets, Inc. ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Appeals Board’s decision in the referenced case was sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on this the 4th day of November, 2015. Name Certified First Class Via Fax Via Email Address Mail Mail Fax Number Email Robin Moore X robinm10s@gmail.com Stephen Seiferth X sts2384@hotmail.com Judith DePrisco X judith@bcnattorneys.us Brian K. Addington, X Via Electronic Mail Judge Kenneth M. Switzer, X Via Electronic Mail Chief Judge Penny Shrum, Clerk, X Penny.Patterson-Shrum@tn.gov Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims Matthew Salyer Clerk, Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board 220 French Landing Dr., Ste. 1-B Nashville, TN 37243 Telephone: 615-253-1606 Electronic Mail: Matthew.Salyer@tn.gov --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4559233. Public record. Not legal advice.