# Momin v. Gonzales

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · August 25, 2006 · 462 F.3d 497

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/45556

## Case

- **Full name:** Amin Memanji MOMIN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 25, 2006
- **Citations:** 462 F.3d 497; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21923
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion by Clement
- **Judges:** Reavley, Clement, Prado
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/45556

## Opinion text

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 25, 2006

_________________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-60119
_________________________

AMIN MEMANJI MOMIN,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

__________________________________________________

Appeal from the Board of Immigration Appeals
(No. A78-562-049)
__________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:

In this petition for panel rehearing, the Petitioner, Amin Memanji Momin, contends that this

court should reconsider its previous decision, Momin v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 447 (5th Cir. 2006), in

light of the repeal of the regulations on which the decision was premised. The new federal regulations

apply to “all cases pending administrative or judicial review on or after May 12, 2006.” Eligibility

of Arriving Aliens in Removal Proceedings, 71 Fed. Reg. 27,585, 27,588 (May 12, 1996); see

-1-
Mouelle v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d 923 (8th Cir. 2005), cert. granted and judgment vacated, 126 S. Ct.

2964 (2006) (remanding to the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of the new

regulations).

On May 12, 2006, the mandate had not issued. Both the Petitioner and the Respondent ask

this court to grant the petition for rehearing, vacate our opinion, and remand the case to the Board

of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) for further proceedings under the new regulations. We agree with

their position.

Accordingly, we GRANT the petition for rehearing, VACATE our previous opinion, 447 F.3d

447, and REMAND the case to the BIA for further proceedings under the new regulations.

-2-

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/45556. Public record. Not legal advice.