# United States v. Frederick Brown, Jr.

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 2, 2020

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4521972

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 2, 2020
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4521972

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7448

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FREDERICK GASTON BROWN, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00149-RGD-3)

Submitted: March 31, 2020 Decided: April 2, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Gaston Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Frederick Gaston Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(B) (2018) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown,

No. 2:90-cr-00149-RGD-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 19, 2019). We deny Brown’s motion to appoint

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4521972. Public record. Not legal advice.