# Anderson Steam Vulcanizer Co. v. Commissioner > United States Board of Tax Appeals · April 6, 1927 · 6 B.T.A. 737 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4499860 ## Case - **Full name:** ANDERSON STEAM VULCANIZER CO., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE - **Court:** United States Board of Tax Appeals - **Decided:** April 6, 1927 - **Citations:** 6 B.T.A. 737; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3427 - **Precedential status:** Published - **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Sternhagen - **Judges:** Sternhagen, Arundell - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4499860 ## Opinion text *742 OPINION. Sternhagen: The petitioner contends that in 1916 it acquired a patent right worth $50,000 for stock of that value and that it has the right to annual deductions for patent exhaustion on this basis. The value of the patent was not proven and hence there is no cost basis for depreciation. *743 The agreement of December 26, 1919, sets up an association essentially similar to that considered in Burk-Waggoner Oil Association v. Hopkins, 269 U. S. 110 , and held to be taxable as a corporation. Petitioner’s counsel in his brief makes no reference to this case. We hold the organization to be an association within the meaning of the Eevenue Act of 1918. See Hecht v. Malley, 265 U. S. 144 . There is furthermore a question as to parties. If, as contendod, the petitioner is in reality three separate entities, how can they be joined as a single petitioner by one verified petition? Judgment will Toe entered for .the respondent. ARundell not participating. --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4499860. Public record. Not legal advice.