# Braly-Ferguson Gin Co. v. Commissioner

> United States Board of Tax Appeals · January 31, 1927 · 5 B.T.A. 1290

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4499304

## Case

- **Full name:** BRALY-FERGUSON GIN CO., <emphasis typestyle="it">v.</emphasis> COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
- **Court:** United States Board of Tax Appeals
- **Decided:** January 31, 1927
- **Citations:** 5 B.T.A. 1290; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3631
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Phillips
- **Judges:** Phillips
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4499304

## Opinion text

Phillips:
This is an appeal from the determination by the Commissioner of a deficiency of $708.48 in income tax for 1922. Petitioner alleges that the Commissioner erred in refusing to allow the deduction of a net loss of $5,267.85 alleged to have been sustained in the year 1921.
FINDINGS OF FACT.
The petitioner is a corporation having its office and place of business at Leonard, Tex. During the years 1921 and 1922 it was engaged in the business of ginning cotton for its customers, buying cotton and cottonseed from its customers, and selling such cotton and cottonseed as were purchased.
The gross income and deductions of the petitioner for the year 1921 were as follows:
Gross income.
Gross sales-$64, 681. 80
Cost of goods sold_ '68, 573.13
-$3,891.33
Rents, warehouse storage_:_:__ 993.15
Ginning fees_ 5,175.25
- 6,168.40
2,277.07
Deductions.
Compensation of officers_ $2, 500. 00
Repairs- 75. 00
Interest_'_ 853.- 60
Taxes___ 172. 70
Other expenses- 3,943.62
- 7,544.92
—5, 267.85
In computing the deficiency for 1922, the Commissioner failed to allow the deduction of $5,267.85 as a net loss sustained in 1921.
Decision for the 'petitioner will he entered on 15 days’ notice, wider Rule 60.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4499304. Public record. Not legal advice.
