# Great W. Power Co. v. Commissioner

> United States Board of Tax Appeals · April 26, 1934 · 30 B.T.A. 503

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4495193

## Case

- **Full name:** GREAT WESTERN POWER COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, <emphasis typestyle="it">v.</emphasis> COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
- **Court:** United States Board of Tax Appeals
- **Decided:** April 26, 1934
- **Citations:** 30 B.T.A. 503; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1317
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Sternhagen
- **Judges:** Sternhagen, Fossan
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4495193

## Opinion text

Sternhagen,
dissenting: In my opinion, the proportionate un-amortized discount and costs of the General Lien 8’s, dealt with in the second point, should not be deducted in 1924 when they were converted, as originally provided, into 7’s; but should be spread over the term of the Y’s. I agree with Judge Mack’s dissenting opinion in San Joaquin Light & Power Co. v. McLaughlin, 65 Fed. (2d) 677, that the obligation of the Y’s should be regarded as a continuation pro tanto of the indebtedness of the original issue.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4495193. Public record. Not legal advice.
