# L. Schepp Co. v. Commissioner

> United States Board of Tax Appeals · January 29, 1932 · 25 B.T.A. 419

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4492414

## Case

- **Full name:** L. SCHEPP COMPANY, <emphasis typestyle="it">v.</emphasis> COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
- **Court:** United States Board of Tax Appeals
- **Decided:** January 29, 1932
- **Citations:** 25 B.T.A. 419; 1932 BTA LEXIS 1530
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Fossan
- **Judges:** Penalty, Imposition, Smith, Lansdon, Sternhagen, Black, Fossan
- **Cited by:** 122 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4492414

## Opinion text

YaN Fossan,
dissenting in part: It is elemental that fraud must be proved by clear and convincing evidence; a mere preponderance is not sufficient. When the evidence in this case is subjected to this test, I find myself unable-to concur in the imposition of the'penalty for fraud.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/4492414. Public record. Not legal advice.
